Skip to main content

Monk and prisoner of azkaban (application of stack data structure)

As mysterious it may sound, this is a problem in Hacker-earth practice problems under data structure criteria. The problem statement is as below:
The problem is given an array A having N integers, for each i(1≤i≤N), find x+y, where x is the largest number less than i such that A[x]>A[i] and y is the smallest number greater than i such that A[y]>A[i]. If there is no x<i such that A[x]>A[i], then take x=−1. Similarly, if there is no y>i such that A[y]>A[i], then take y=−1.
Input Format:
First line consists of a single integer denoting N.
Second line consists of N space separated integers denoting the array A.
Output Format:
Print N space separated integers, denoting x+y for each i(1≤i≤N)
Constraints:
1≤N≤10⁶
1≤A[i]≤10¹⁸
This problem was set by vaibhab jamini and was tested by prateek garg. It also appeared on a hacker-earth challenge named codemonk with some other data structure related problems.
Discussion:
So first of all, in someone’s mind, a very easy algorithm will pop up which is that parse through the array and for each array element, find the x and y and then we are done. Finding the x and y in this way is a easy way. But as soon as you write this, you understand that, this algorithm is O(n²) order algorithm and therefore it will give you a time limit when the constraint is as high as 10⁶.
This happens too. On writing the following C code, I have got 3 cases solved and other inputs provide a “time limit exceeded” notice. This means that you need a better algorithm.
Here, I mention my naive method for referral.
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{ int N;int i; int j;
 scanf(“%d”,&N);
 long long *A=(long long *)calloc(N+2,sizeof(long long));
 long long *B=(long long *)calloc(N+2,sizeof(long long));
 for(i=0;i<N;i++)
 {
 scanf(“%lld”,&A[i]);
 }
 for(i=0;i<N;i++)
 {
 int x=-1; int y=-1;
 for(j=i-1;j>-1;j — )
 {
 if(A[j]>A[i])
 {
 x=j+1;
 break;
 }
 }
 for(j=i+1;j<N;j++)
 {
 if(A[j]>A[i])
 {
 y=j+1;
 break;
 }
 }
 B[i]=x
 B[i+1]=i;
 B[i+2]=y;
 printf(“%d “,B[i]);
 }

}
Now, I start to search for a better algorithm. Now as it seems, it is a variation problem of a so called “stock span problem” in which one is given an array of par day stock price and is supposed to find the number of days for which the stock price was less than that day’s price. This question is solved using a stack implementation. Statement of the stock span problem can be found here. Also, if you want to know what a stack is or want to take a casual look at a sample code, please look here
First one takes i. Then one finds the index h(i) which denotes the maximum index less than i such that A[h(i)]>A[i]. Then one saves the i,h(i),h(h(i)).. in a stack. Now, when one goes from i to i+1, then,
if A[i+1]<A[i], then x=i; else A[i+1]>A[i], so the stack can directly provide the next best solution for this as the previous element greater than A[i] is the previous element in the stack. So, we basically do the following:
(a)we create the stock from right i=0. We save h(0).
(b) In each step, i, we compare the top of the stack and A[i]. We pop until top>A[i]. Then we push i. If the stack becomes empty, then we push i as the first node and the required x for i becomes -1.
This algorithm clearly gives a better solution. The code of this is not added to the post to just leave a little work for the readers. Also, better algorithms can be thought for the same problem.
So, this was my take of the problem,comment to let me know what you think of the problem.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tinder bio generation with OpenAI GPT-3 API

Introduction: Recently I got access to OpenAI API beta. After a few simple experiments, I set on creating a simple test project. In this project, I will try to create good tinder bio for a specific person.  The abc of openai API playground: In the OpenAI API playground, you get a prompt, and then you can write instructions or specific text to trigger a response from the gpt-3 models. There are also a number of preset templates which loads a specific kind of prompt and let's you generate pre-prepared results. What are the models available? There are 4 models which are stable. These are: (1) curie (2) babbage (3) ada (4) da-vinci da-vinci is the strongest of them all and can perform all downstream tasks which other models can do. There are 2 other new models which openai introduced this year (2021) named da-vinci-instruct-beta and curie-instruct-beta. These instruction models are specifically built for taking in instructions. As OpenAI blog explains and also you will see in our

Can we write codes automatically with GPT-3?

 Introduction: OpenAI created and released the first versions of GPT-3 back in 2021 beginning. We wrote a few text generation articles that time and tested how to create tinder bio using GPT-3 . If you are interested to know more on what is GPT-3 or what is openai, how the server look, then read the tinder bio article. In this article, we will explore Code generation with OpenAI models.  It has been noted already in multiple blogs and exploration work, that GPT-3 can even solve leetcode problems. We will try to explore how good the OpenAI model can "code" and whether prompt tuning will improve or change those performances. Basic coding: We will try to see a few data structure coding performance by GPT-3. (a) Merge sort with python:  First with 200 words limit, it couldn't complete the Write sample code for merge sort in python.   def merge(arr, l, m, r):     n1 = m - l + 1     n2 = r- m       # create temp arrays     L = [0] * (n1)     R = [0] * (n

What is Bort?

 Introduction: Bort, is the new and more optimized version of BERT; which came out this october from amazon science. I came to know about it today while parsing amazon science's news on facebook about bort. So Bort is the newest addition to the long list of great LM models with extra-ordinary achievements.  Why is Bort important? Bort, is a model of 5.5% effective and 16% total size of the original BERT model; and is 20x faster than BERT, while being able to surpass the BERT model in 20 out of 23 tasks; to quote the abstract of the paper,  ' it obtains performance improvements of between 0 . 3% and 31%, absolute, with respect to BERT-large, on multiple public natural language understanding (NLU) benchmarks. ' So what made this achievement possible? The main idea behind creation of Bort is to go beyond the shallow depth of weight pruning, connection deletion or merely factoring the NN into different matrix factorizations and thus distilling it. While methods like knowle