Skip to main content

Shapiro-wilk test(python use included)

Introduction

We will talk about shapiro-wilk, kruskal-wallis, Mann-whitney, wilcoxon rank test and some other tests in this and other continuing posts.These tests are crucial in establishing different assumptions about samples, tests and modelings. Let's start this series with this post describing shapiro wilk test.

Shapiro wilk test:

The first brick in buildings of statistics is samples and assumptions about them. When basic statistics courses are taught, we assume normality in a majority of things and later on going into details we drop this assumption from time to time and then we face number of difficulties. Now, this test in hand,  
shapiro wilk test is to test the sample for normality.
Basically the test was developed by S.S.Shapiro and M.B. Wilk in a 1965 paper published in biometrica. Here is a link for the paper,(it may not open if you or your institute does not have a j-stor subscription).

Description of the test:

The test runs by producing a test statistics, W from the random sample x1, x2,...,xn. This test statistics( as mentioned in the paper) is obtained by dividing the square of an appropriate linear combination of the sample points by the usual estimate of variance obtainable from the sample.
If this test statistics is small, then in general it depicts deviation from normal distribution, while the bigger values indicate normality.
Now, I will add clips from the original paper about the derivation and justifications below:
So, I hope after reading the above snippets this is clear that the linear combination coefficients are derived from the variance covariance matrix and higher values take us towards normality and lesser values deviate the distribution away from normal distribution.
report a Shapiro-Wilk test:
In general, to report a Shapiro Wilk test, one has to report both the values of the w-statistics, as well as the p-value of the hypothesis test. In this case, a higher p-value indicates that if the p-value is more than the significance value, you can not reject the null hypothesis and therefore the data normality also can not be rejected.

python use and stats.shapiro package:

In python, there is direct function for shapiro wilk test. I am posting a clip for a shapiro wilk test being performed in a jupyter notebook below:

So clearly from scipy.stats scipy.stats you can get shapiro test done. Now, the sample can be fed as the data in numpy array format to the shapiro function and it generates the p-value and the w-statistics value. Clearly as it is close to 1 therefore it leads us to think already that the data comes from normal. Other thing which comes here is that the p-value for more ensurance. You can use this code with some modification according to your data and check for shapiro data. 

shapiro test in r

For R,there is a shapiro.test function where you can provide the data as a vector to the function and then get the w value and the p value back. The link for the shapiro.test official documentation here. Now, follow the code to see how I test a normal sample in r and a poisson sample in r both with shapiro.test and how the result comes out.
So,clearly, in the end the p-value is the more determining factor, as a poisson data also creates quite a high w value, therefore the w-statistics value does not have that much significance as the p-value has. You can clearly see that p-value is almost 0 in case of the poisson data and very high in case of normal data. So, to end this discussion, in case of the shapiro wilk test, p-value is the deterministic metric while w is the used test statistics.

normality test in Minitab:

I tried to find Minitab Shapiro Wilk test. It seems Minitab does not support Shapiro Wilk test. It supports the anderson-darling test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and Ryan-joiner test. To perform normality test in Minitab, follow this simplilearn Minitab article.

Kruskal-wallis test:

We will update about kruskal wallis test soon. But if you want to know what we will discuss upon, see
(1) wiki link 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tinder bio generation with OpenAI GPT-3 API

Introduction: Recently I got access to OpenAI API beta. After a few simple experiments, I set on creating a simple test project. In this project, I will try to create good tinder bio for a specific person.  The abc of openai API playground: In the OpenAI API playground, you get a prompt, and then you can write instructions or specific text to trigger a response from the gpt-3 models. There are also a number of preset templates which loads a specific kind of prompt and let's you generate pre-prepared results. What are the models available? There are 4 models which are stable. These are: (1) curie (2) babbage (3) ada (4) da-vinci da-vinci is the strongest of them all and can perform all downstream tasks which other models can do. There are 2 other new models which openai introduced this year (2021) named da-vinci-instruct-beta and curie-instruct-beta. These instruction models are specifically built for taking in instructions. As OpenAI blog explains and also you will see in our

Can we write codes automatically with GPT-3?

 Introduction: OpenAI created and released the first versions of GPT-3 back in 2021 beginning. We wrote a few text generation articles that time and tested how to create tinder bio using GPT-3 . If you are interested to know more on what is GPT-3 or what is openai, how the server look, then read the tinder bio article. In this article, we will explore Code generation with OpenAI models.  It has been noted already in multiple blogs and exploration work, that GPT-3 can even solve leetcode problems. We will try to explore how good the OpenAI model can "code" and whether prompt tuning will improve or change those performances. Basic coding: We will try to see a few data structure coding performance by GPT-3. (a) Merge sort with python:  First with 200 words limit, it couldn't complete the Write sample code for merge sort in python.   def merge(arr, l, m, r):     n1 = m - l + 1     n2 = r- m       # create temp arrays     L = [0] * (n1)     R = [0] * (n

What is Bort?

 Introduction: Bort, is the new and more optimized version of BERT; which came out this october from amazon science. I came to know about it today while parsing amazon science's news on facebook about bort. So Bort is the newest addition to the long list of great LM models with extra-ordinary achievements.  Why is Bort important? Bort, is a model of 5.5% effective and 16% total size of the original BERT model; and is 20x faster than BERT, while being able to surpass the BERT model in 20 out of 23 tasks; to quote the abstract of the paper,  ' it obtains performance improvements of between 0 . 3% and 31%, absolute, with respect to BERT-large, on multiple public natural language understanding (NLU) benchmarks. ' So what made this achievement possible? The main idea behind creation of Bort is to go beyond the shallow depth of weight pruning, connection deletion or merely factoring the NN into different matrix factorizations and thus distilling it. While methods like knowle